Real-World Asset Tokenisation in Kenya: Legal Questions Founders Should Resolve
Before tokenising property or other assets, founders should resolve a set of foundational legal questions. Here is a practical map.
Read insight →Kenya now has an operational statutory framework for virtual asset service providers. We help exchanges, wallet providers, payment businesses, tokenisation platforms and virtual asset offerings work out what that means for them, and prepare for licensing.
The Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 gave persons already providing virtual asset services at commencement a one-year transitional period, running from 4 November 2025, to regularise their position under the licensing regime. That window closes on 4 November 2026. This applies specifically to existing operators; new entrants and offshore platforms serving Kenyan customers should assess their own position under the Act and the 2026 Regulations before commencing or continuing operations, rather than assuming the same timeline applies to them.
Discuss your transition timelineThe Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 (Act No. 20 of 2025) commenced on 4 November 2025 and establishes a licensing and supervisory framework for virtual asset service providers operating in or from Kenya. The Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026 (Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026), gazetted on 22 July 2026, supply the operating detail: application requirements, governance and fit-and-proper standards, capital and liquidity expectations, custody and asset-segregation rules, cybersecurity and systems controls, and ongoing reporting obligations.
For a business already operating, or planning to operate, an exchange, wallet, payment, brokerage, advisory, asset management, tokenisation or virtual asset offering model touching Kenya, the practical question is no longer whether the sector is regulated. It is which licence category applies, which regulator has jurisdiction, and what a compliant application file looks like.
The Act divides supervisory responsibility between the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority. Rather than a simple "payments vs markets" rule of thumb, the Act allocates supervision by specific defined activity, so each activity a business performs should be checked individually against the current First Schedule; see our CBK vs CMA guide for a category-by-category breakdown. A business that combines several functions, for example a platform that both custodies assets and operates a trading venue, may need to consider its position under more than one regulator.
Not sure which licence applies? Classification depends on what the platform actually does, how customer funds and assets move, and which services are genuinely provided, not on how the product is marketed or described. We review the business model, customer journey and asset flows and map them against the licence categories in the Act and Regulations.
Request a licence classification review| Regulatory issue | Who it affects | How we can assist |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory classification | Any business unsure which VASP activity or regulator applies | Identifying the relevant regulated activity or activities and the applicable regulator, CBK, CMA, or both |
| Licence application preparation | Applicants ready to file | Preparing the application dossier, business plan, corporate information and supporting documentation |
| Governance & fit-and-proper readiness | Boards, senior officers and significant shareholders | Advising on directors, senior officers, beneficial ownership and governance structure against regulatory expectations |
| Custody & wallet compliance | Custodial wallet providers and exchanges | Structuring customer asset arrangements, segregation and custody documentation |
| Crypto/fiat payment & gateway structuring | Payment processors and gateway operators | Mapping payment architecture and conversion flows against the applicable licensing analysis |
| Tokenisation & real-world assets | Tokenisation platforms and asset owners | Structuring tokenisation arrangements, underlying rights and offering documentation |
| Virtual asset offerings | ICO, stablecoin and token issuance platforms | Advising on token issuance, offering documentation and disclosure requirements |
| AML/CFT/CPF | All licensed VASPs | Enterprise risk assessment, KYC/CDD policies, enhanced due diligence and suspicious transaction procedures |
| Cybersecurity & technology controls | All licensed VASPs, especially exchanges and custodians | Policies, outsourcing arrangements, systems governance and incident response documentation |
| Consumer protection & disclosure | Businesses onboarding retail customers | Customer terms, risk disclosures and complaints-handling documentation |
| Continuing regulatory compliance | Licensed VASPs post-grant | Regulatory reporting, licence conditions, governance changes and periodic reviews |
This is an educational starting point, not an automated legal opinion. Consider the questions below, then speak to us for a proper classification review, since more than one answer can be "yes" for a single business.
A "yes" to more than one of these questions usually means more than one activity, and possibly more than one regulator, needs to be considered together, not a single generic licence.
Get a regulatory classification assessmentThe Regulations require a structured application file. This is a practical starting point, not an exhaustive statement of what your specific licence category requires:
See our application documents checklist for the full breakdown by category.
Request an application readiness reviewOur typical engagement runs in four stages, calibrated to how far along your business already is:
Before tokenising property or other assets, founders should resolve a set of foundational legal questions. Here is a practical map.
Read insight →CMA and CBK jurisdiction, the regulatory sandbox, SAFTs, SPVs and AML compliance for token-based capital raises.
Read insight →If your business carries on a regulated virtual asset activity in or from Kenya, such as operating an exchange, custody, payment processing, brokerage, advisory, asset management, or a token or stablecoin offering, it will generally need to be licensed under the Act and the 2026 Regulations. The correct classification depends on what the business actually does, not what it calls itself.
Both. The Act creates a dual-regulator model, with the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority each responsible for defined categories of virtual asset activity. A business operating more than one regulated function may need to engage with both regulators.
Section 47 of the Act gave persons already providing virtual asset services at commencement one year, running from 4 November 2025, to regularise their position. That transitional window closes on 4 November 2026. It applies to existing operators; new entrants and offshore platforms should assess their own position under the Act and Regulations before commencing or continuing to serve Kenyan customers.
The framework is understood to extend to providers targeting Kenyan customers or deriving business from Kenya even without a local physical presence. Whether a specific offshore platform falls within scope depends on factors such as its customer base, marketing, currency support and local partnerships, and should be assessed on the facts.
The Regulations set out detailed requirements covering corporate and ownership information, directors and senior officer fit-and-proper documentation, a business plan, financial and capital information, governance and risk-management frameworks, AML/CFT/CPF policies, cybersecurity and systems documentation, and custody arrangements where relevant. The precise mix depends on the licence category sought.
Yes. We assist with regulatory classification, corporate and governance readiness, and preparation of the application dossier and supporting documentation, and we support clients through regulator engagement and subsequent compliance.
The information on this website is general in nature, is not legal advice, and does not create an advocate-client relationship. Figures, fees, capital thresholds and procedural requirements under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 and the Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026 should be confirmed against the current Gazette text and regulator guidance before action is taken, as these may be updated or clarified over time. Please contact Njau & Associates Advocates for advice on your specific circumstances.